God of Fire vs Hibiscus Mahajad: Let’s Compare

Posted by Anastasia Novosad on

From Fire to Florals: A Sensory Journey Through Two Niche Icons

Some perfumes whisper, others roar and I love both. Recently, I explored two powerful niche scents that couldn’t be more different yet equally magnetic: God of Fire by Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777 and Hibiscus Mahajád by Maison Crivelli. Both are extrait de parfum concentrations with serious presence, but they tell very different stories on my skin. I wore them on alternate days to feel their character, evolution, and impact. Here’s how these two olfactory worlds unfolded for me and why you might fall for one… or both.

Where Sunlight Meets Smoke: God of Fire by Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777

On my skin, God of Fire opens with a bold, solar brightness—it feels like stepping into a vibrant summer day where mangoes ripen in warm air. The energy is dynamic, playful, and a little wild. As hours pass, it deepens into a rich amber-woody base that lingers like a smoky memory. This scent wears with confidence: it's the kind of fragrance I’d reach for when I want to turn heads without saying a word. It balances exotic sweetness with a mysterious edge, and its longevity—easily 8+ hours—is just as powerful as its first impression.

Velvet Petals and Crimson Tea: Maison Crivelli Hibiscus Mahajád

Wearing Hibiscus Mahajád feels like slipping into something plush and unexpected. On my skin, it bursts with juicy floral brightness—like sipping hibiscus tea laced with red fruit, mint, and a touch of spice. But this isn’t a simple fruity floral; the rose, leather, and vanilla deepen it, creating a creamy, luxurious finish that stays close but powerful. The projection is assertive, the mood elegant but bold. I find it effortlessly sensual—something I’d wear for evening dinners or days when I want to feel polished and magnetic. It’s luscious, long-lasting, and full of charisma.

Comparing the Two Perfumes

Both fragrances are extrait-level and built to last, but they tell different stories. God of Fire is bright, tropical, and slightly smoky—perfect for daytime flair and sunlit escapes. Hibiscus Mahajád leans into plush florals and gourmand accents with an almost velvet-like finish, ideal for cooler nights or glamour-forward looks. On my skin, God of Fire feels more unisex and radiant, while Hibiscus Mahajád veers into a lush, feminine sensuality. One evokes barefoot walks under palm trees; the other, candlelit lounges and silk dresses. It’s less about which is better—and more about which version of yourself you want to express.

I love how God of Fire and Hibiscus Mahajád embody totally different energies without compromising on quality. They’re both bold niche choices with exceptional projection, longevity, and storytelling. On my skin, each reveals something personal—God of Fire brings out my playful, radiant side, while Hibiscus Mahajád unveils depth and sensuality. If you’re drawn to vibrant fruity-woody scents or rich floral gourmands, these two are must-tries. Don’t compare them to choose—compare them to understand. And who knows? You might need both in your collection, just like I do, depending on the mood, the moment, and the magic you want to wear.

Stanislav’s Expert opinions

This 2022 fragrance from Stéphane Humbert Lucas is a fusion of juicy mango, sparkly ginger, and zesty lemon. It slowly evolves into a creamy, warm heart with jasmine and coumarin. The real magic happens in the dry down. Smoky oud and Nagarmotha combine with radiant amber and musk to create a subtly exotic base. The layers are well-blended and clear, but some people find the base a bit synthetic or like BR 540. It has a sweet, musky, gourmand vibe. In short, it's a bright, woody fragrance with a polished structure and strong projection. It has a niche vibe, but some people might not like the synthetic base notes.

FAQ

Does God of Fire perform well in hot, humid climates?

Yes. Users report 6–8 hours on skin and even longer on clothing, projection is strong enough to cut through summer humidity without overwhelming

Will this scent get compliments?

Absolutely—many describe it as “crowd‑pleasing” and “attention‑grabbing,” with bright tropical mango and warm amber making it a compliment magnet

Is it similar to Baccarat Rouge 540?

Some users note a shared airy ambroxan vibe in the dry-down, though this leans tropical-fruity rather than sweet-powdery like BR540

How synthetic does it smell?

The juicy mango accord and musky dry-down can come off as synthetic—some find it fun and candy-like, others describe it as overly candied


Go to full site